I am wondering why the Republicans want to gear up for a big fight over the summer that is largely political when the President's and Democrats' campaign will largely center around Republican defiance, obstructionism and hyper-partisanship.
Amblin wrote:I am wondering why the Republicans want to gear up for a big fight over the summer that is largely political when the President's and Democrats' campaign will largely center around Republican defiance, obstructionism and hyper-partisanship.
this has been a theme since january 2009, but all of the concrete examples of this have really been haunting me lately
grover norquist is the demon leader of the nightmare
i press myself to admit that democratic congresses have behaved similarly with a republican executive but i really don't think that they have
andrei wrote: i heard james joyce is tough, this is probably like the james joyce of rap, ostensibly, if you wanna think of it in those terms. haha, and it bumps, too!
Alaskasoft Corporation wrote:Alaskasoft Corporation and Sordid Affair...two classic great men
Amblin wrote:I am wondering why the Republicans want to gear up for a big fight over the summer that is largely political when the President's and Democrats' campaign will largely center around Republican defiance, obstructionism and hyper-partisanship.
Because the Republicans see the defiance, obstructionism, and hyper-partisanship as positives.
Amblin wrote:I am wondering why the Republicans want to gear up for a big fight over the summer that is largely political when the President's and Democrats' campaign will largely center around Republican defiance, obstructionism and hyper-partisanship.
Because the Republicans see the defiance, obstructionism, and hyper-partisanship as positives.
Many key voters don't and maybe one day they will figure it out. For now we might see the public be more aware of their tendencies towards these three things if it really comes to the surface over this Holder fight in Congress. A similar thing happened during the last Democratic Administration.
Amblin wrote:I am wondering why the Republicans want to gear up for a big fight over the summer that is largely political when the President's and Democrats' campaign will largely center around Republican defiance, obstructionism and hyper-partisanship.
Because the Republicans see the defiance, obstructionism, and hyper-partisanship as positives.
Many key voters don't and maybe one day they will figure it out. For now we might see the public be more aware of their tendencies towards these three things if it really comes to the surface over this Holder fight in Congress. A similar thing happened during the last Democratic Administration.
i don't think the group of voters you're talking about pay close enough attention to the procedural stuff to put the deserved amount of blame on the republicans; they just hear an agreement can't be reached and assume equal proportions of blame
it's like how only the most dedicated judge judy fans will listen to the merits of each litigants case, and the majority will just enjoy watching two hopeless scumbags squirm
I am not talking about procedure at all. I am talking about Republicans starting a big, unnecessary battle with the White House over an issue that has nothing to do with the economy or jobs the summer before the Presidential election. I think people will notice that on their own and because OFA/DNC shows them.
About 16 months actually, and even Scott Rasmussen says conservatives are who are paying the most attention to this. Romney doesn't want this to be a big story and like I said, the SCOTUS ruling will suck the life from it.. especially if the decision comes tomorrow.
Guy Incognito wrote:this just in, supreme court decides on italian grinders for lunch, with justice roberts the single dissenting vote
scaliaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Scalia quoted as saying "What is a grinder, anyway? Am I supposed to know what every kind of sandwich is? Is that something my clerks should have to spend their time researching? Whatever, I'll take one."