Fletch wrote:because hammering away and tying obama to F&F will help them
people will not see this as obstructionist. holder is a clown and now obama is implicated. what more could the repubs want?
Fletch wrote:because hammering away and tying obama to F&F will help them
people will not see this as obstructionist. holder is a clown and now obama is implicated. what more could the repubs want?
dr. badvibes wrote:they just hear an agreement can't be reached and assume equal proportions of blame

i need to get a date with this BEER so i can tickle torture my inhibitions!!

Lucky wrote:Fuck a crumpet,


Guy Incognito wrote:this just in, supreme court decides on italian grinders for lunch, with justice roberts the single dissenting vote
Lucky wrote:Fuck a crumpet,



mattstan wrote:Guy Incognito wrote:this just in, supreme court decides on italian grinders for lunch, with justice roberts the single dissenting vote
scaliaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa


Lucky wrote:Fuck a crumpet,

Lucky wrote:Fuck a crumpet,




Amblin wrote:Imagine thinking back to where you were and what you were doing for the announcement of one of the United States Supreme Court's most historical decisions and saying to yourselves "I was joking about sandwiches the entire time."
Luckily that didn't happen. Let's try to be a little more serious come Monday guys.
Lucky wrote:Fuck a crumpet,


Amblin wrote:Imagine thinking back to where you were and what you were doing for the announcement of one of the United States Supreme Court's most historical decisions and saying to yourselves "I was joking about sandwiches the entire time."
Luckily that didn't happen. Let's try to be a little more serious come Monday guys.






badhat wrote:bike solve all problems

Amblin wrote:I can't believe sandwich talk lead to my downfall.
Do you guys want to talk about the idea that all nine justices viewed that naked butt scene from NYPD Blue together in making their decision against the FCC that was released today?
Lucky wrote:Fuck a crumpet,

