tron wrote:the action sequences could have made up for all the other boring shit if they were actually fast-paced... it was like watching snails roll around during the light cycle scene... booooooooooooring.
Are you serious with this shit? Like I honestly can't even kind of understand how you formed this opinion.
because i watched the movie and the pacing was really slow
Architecture wrote:even a lot of that was 3D, including the break-in and most of the preamble before sam gets digitized.
this was all 2d in my theater. i had my glasses off until they went into grid
maybe it's an IMAX thing? i took off my glasses when he was cracking open the door, but it was double vision. even the scene with alan was 3D. i'm gonna have to google this and figure it out.
so that was cillian murphy. i remember thinking, "that dude looks and sounds just like cillian murphy," but never got a second chance to confirm it was him.
Architecture wrote:even a lot of that was 3D, including the break-in and most of the preamble before sam gets digitized.
this was all 2d in my theater. i had my glasses off until they went into grid
maybe it's an IMAX thing? i took off my glasses when he was cracking open the door, but it was double vision. even the scene with alan was 3D. i'm gonna have to google this and figure it out.
I saw it in IMAX and while the entire movie had the polarized double-image, the sequences in the real world were definitely not in 3D.
yeah, i'm a little weirded out that so many people cant distinguish between 3d and 2d. got to watch it on the largest screen in the US at its grand opening.
had a friend who swore up and down it was all 3d and still believes so, despite the goddamn disclaimer at the start of the movie that declares otherwise.
I thought the most impressive 3-D sequence in Avatar was at the very beginning when the soldiers were all lined up in the ship getting ready to do space-stuff. Like, the human stuff was really impressive, not so much the flying blue cat people and their dinosaur friends.
And I feel like this year is really about, just the year of realizing stuff.
glosstime wrote:i was hoping olivia wilde's character would be more of a sassy aeon flux type
it's almost creepy that she's the romantic interest given how mentally childlike she is
For real. The movie is pretty weird about women in general. Although I think it's probably historically accurate that in a world built by a computer programmer in the '80s four of the five women who exist would be forced to wear iridescent strips on their inner thighs and block heels.
Jefferson Zeppelin wrote:just saw this today. looked great, but story sucked. my main takeaway was that Olivia Wilde was really smoking hot
cosign
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Ken Jennings: @PaulMcCartney would you tell my friend Greg that Rocky Raccoon is just an Old West guy w/ a nickname, not a giant anthropomorphic raccoon