STAR TREK: Discovery

The primary forum for general discussion of Hipinion.com

would you play shuffleboard with capt picard?

Yes!
67
85%
No!
12
15%
 
Total votes : 79

Postby captain » Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:24 am

doomedhuh you should make more videos
ive been thinkin about my life lately and in short im goin A-WALL
User avatar
captain
 
Posts: 7992
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:27 pm
Location: Rancho Cucamonga

Postby captain » Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:25 am

also are you retarded
ive been thinkin about my life lately and in short im goin A-WALL
User avatar
captain
 
Posts: 7992
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:27 pm
Location: Rancho Cucamonga

Postby Durham » Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:28 am

Image
User avatar
Durham
 
Posts: 38788
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: 火車

Postby canned_bear » Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:30 am

Steve Spillberg has him all shook up.
User avatar
canned_bear
 
Posts: 601
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:32 pm

Postby Durham » Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:36 am

I just made 3 posts in a row where all I posted was a single photo of King Abdullah II of Jordan. Who else can say that?
User avatar
Durham
 
Posts: 38788
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: 火車

Postby Bob511 » Sat Jun 25, 2011 7:03 pm

They should probably give the movie to someone who actually wants to make it, don't you think?
universe, you can't play the willfully ignorant, but partisan bleeding heart
User avatar
Bob511
 
Posts: 6568
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:54 pm
Location: Boynton Beach, FL

Postby Locke » Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:49 pm

hey doomedhuh i just listened to "Story of my Life" and it sucked dick
User avatar
Locke
 
Posts: 12418
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 2:03 am

Postby Architecture » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:14 pm

I would much rather them take a while to make an awesome movie than fast-track it and leave us with another sub-par Star Trek movie. I know you're both* lukewarm on 2009, but that movie is so much goddamn fun.

*JB & Bob
try the data then reply
User avatar
Architecture
ok
 
Posts: 19843
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:39 am
Location: Texas

Postby Architecture » Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:56 pm

I dunno, I think that's better than franchise fatigue. It'll be four years between TDK and TDKR. I think it helps keep the excitement level up.
try the data then reply
User avatar
Architecture
ok
 
Posts: 19843
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:39 am
Location: Texas

Postby Ted Pikul » Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:58 pm

Man, that awful thread we had about The Dark Knight was already 4 years ago?
http://pickleoffact.tumblr.com

inspectorhound wrote:You are the biggest sociopath on this board
User avatar
Ted Pikul
DARE.
 
Posts: 30665
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Salvador Dali's garden party

Postby Jeremy » Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:59 pm

Maybe J. J. Abrams realized that he was the most morally myopic filmmaker since Frank Capra and had to rethink how to do Star Trek.
User avatar
Jeremy
 
Posts: 42635
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:46 pm

Postby TASKER, JERRY L » Sat Jul 30, 2011 7:02 pm

Ghostbusters 3 or Star Trek XII first?
How sad. He really does loves you its just that your now too famous to be considered "cool" to listen to.
So is the life of a hipster/emo/punk/goth/ and the many forms insecure gays guise themself as throughout the ages.
User avatar
TASKER, JERRY L
 
Posts: 3203
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:02 pm
Location: watering the lawn while badhat's son bikes to school

Postby Ted Pikul » Sat Jul 30, 2011 7:04 pm

If they did another Star Trek TV show would you watch it?
http://pickleoffact.tumblr.com

inspectorhound wrote:You are the biggest sociopath on this board
User avatar
Ted Pikul
DARE.
 
Posts: 30665
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Salvador Dali's garden party

Postby KALM » Sat Jul 30, 2011 7:06 pm

i said yes after voyager but then i gave up on enterprise halfway through the opening credits
User avatar
KALM
 
Posts: 10493
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:45 pm

Postby Jeremy » Sat Jul 30, 2011 7:08 pm

I want them to do one about Starfleet's petty bureaucrats and stevedores.
User avatar
Jeremy
 
Posts: 42635
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:46 pm

Postby Jeremy » Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:44 pm

That's the most idiotic waste of cross-promotion potential I ever heard of.
User avatar
Jeremy
 
Posts: 42635
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:46 pm

Postby Architecture » Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:59 pm

How about a radio drama podcast
try the data then reply
User avatar
Architecture
ok
 
Posts: 19843
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:39 am
Location: Texas

Postby reversemigraine » Sun Jul 31, 2011 1:02 am

Maybe at least this will give everyone time to kinda age into their characters.

Like by the time the movie finally gets made, they'll kinda be at the same point in time that the TOS cast was in S1 or something.

Then again, maybe by the time it's made, they all look like they did in Star Trek V.
reversemigraine
 
Posts: 10433
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:40 pm

Postby Ted Pikul » Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:12 am

The TNG cast aged so terribly compared to the TOS cast

The TOS cast looked pretty good in IV but suddenly all beat in V, but they managed to bounce back for VI by embracing the fact that they were all near retirement. Plus Shatner later grew into his jolly old fat man persona and Takei and Nichols still look really good for their ages

Everyone in TNG besides Patrick Stewart looks like they got dragged through a deep fryer since Nemesis. I think the last time I saw Jonathan Frakes was in the Enterprise finale and he had a puffy, baggy face and looked like he wanted someone to shoot him
http://pickleoffact.tumblr.com

inspectorhound wrote:You are the biggest sociopath on this board
User avatar
Ted Pikul
DARE.
 
Posts: 30665
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Salvador Dali's garden party

Postby smg » Sun Aug 21, 2011 3:23 am

Abrams already told us that he wants to make sure that his second Trek film stands on its own.

"I think the most important thing to remember is that it doesn't matter if anyone has seen the first one or not. It doesn't matter what the first one was, in a way. This has to be a movie that stands on its own," he explained.


i'm pretty sure this means abrams has totally forgotten what the first movie was about and possibly even that it was a star trek movie and that it was about people on a spaceship
smg
 
Posts: 867
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:06 am

Postby cram » Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:32 pm

maybe he's already made the movie and just has to travel back in time to release it
User avatar
cram
 
Posts: 7876
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:36 pm
Location: jack-knifed over his flying fist

Postby RAMBLIN MAN » Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:02 am

Attention impatient sequelphiles: Vulture can confirm that J.J. Abrams has finally committed to shooting Star Trek 2. Insiders familiar with the director's plans tell Vulture that pre-production is underway, that the script will be done by month's end and that Abrams will start shooting this winter.

While many assumed he would make the follow-up to his 2009 hit, he would never give a date for the project, or actually say for sure that he would be the one directing. In July, reports elsewhere surfaced that Abrams was “moving towards a commitment” to direct the sequel (which, of course, is Internet for “hasn’t committed yet”) but his delay had pushed a nervous Paramount Pictures to give Trek 2's late June 2012 release date to a G.I. Joe sequel.

Part of the hold-up has been that Alex Kurtzman, who wrote Abrams' first Trek with Roberto “Bob” Orci, has been busy editing and posting Welcome to People, his directing debut at DreamWorks Pictures. We’re told that now that Kurtzman is finished with those duties, he is back in his office and the team is ready to work. Plug in the Starbucks I.V., lads! These new life-forms and new civilizations aren’t going to seek out themselves!


http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/09/star_trek_2_jj_abrams.html
User avatar
RAMBLIN MAN
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:14 am

Postby Ankh » Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:19 am

we don't have a GI Joe sequel thread?
User avatar
Ankh
senior fellow
 
Posts: 19681
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:01 am
Location: the gracious core

Postby Architecture » Wed Sep 14, 2011 11:28 am

So does that mean a Fall 2012 or Summer 2013 release?
try the data then reply
User avatar
Architecture
ok
 
Posts: 19843
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:39 am
Location: Texas

Postby smg » Wed Sep 14, 2011 11:30 am

star trek xii is going to take all the best qualities from star trek xi and cram it into a single movie
smg
 
Posts: 867
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:06 am

Postby smg » Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:34 pm

abrams wife probably makes him keep rewatching the harry potter movies
smg
 
Posts: 867
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:06 am

Postby mikey » Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:01 pm

jb, would you watch a bryan fuller helmed star trek series? according to his imdb bio, he wants to have a tv series in the same reality as jj abrams' star trek but on some other ship

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0298188/bio
sordid affair wrote:who is the government to tell me whether or not i can have a four loko w/ my pop tart
User avatar
mikey
Voldemort
 
Posts: 8472
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 8:55 am

Postby Robert » Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:38 pm

:evil:
User avatar
Robert
 
Posts: 3008
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 11:41 pm

Postby smg » Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:22 pm

i don't like the idea of abrams and eric kripke hanging out
smg
 
Posts: 867
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:06 am

Postby Architecture » Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:37 pm

JB why don't you write Abrams a letter
try the data then reply
User avatar
Architecture
ok
 
Posts: 19843
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:39 am
Location: Texas

Next

Return to Free-For-All

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Conetoaster, danno, Geoff, glaucon, Google [Bot], Grey Poupon, hired goon, internethandle, LloydChristmas, marble, mego, nosebleeds, patrick cokane?, something sensible if, tyler_c, Yahoo [Bot]