MARVEL Movies - Phase 2

Jesus christ you have to be kidding me.

Postby reepicheep » Thu Mar 01, 2012 8:57 am

the second arc in the Ultimates could be loosely followed. Hulk goes berserk, gets exiled. Black Widow turns heel. SHIELD gets infiltrated. Skrull/whatever marvel can call them orchestrating the whole thing.
User avatar
reepicheep
 
Posts: 2429
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:15 am
Location: Sulk Sity

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby number none » Thu Mar 01, 2012 11:00 am

This would obviously have an impact on any Pym involvement though it's been in development for ages and doesn't seem any closer to being made

Edgar Wright plans to direct an action film for Marvel Studios with some humorous elements, insisting that Ant-Man will not be a comedy like Fantastic Four or a spoof.[12] The script has been written by Wright and Joe Cornish, who plan to include Henry Pym and Scott Lang as major characters, with Pym as Ant-Man in the 1960s in Tales to Astonish style, and a flashforward to Lang as Ant-Man's successor in modern day.[13]
User avatar
number none
 
Posts: 7402
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:00 pm

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby j_brooks » Thu Mar 01, 2012 12:46 pm

reepicheep wrote:I can't see the whole civil war thing working.

The Avengers seem to be very closely tied to SHIELD anyway, a government org. I can't see how any of the current roster would have a problem with being registered in the first place. There won't be enough time to establish rouge groups of superheros fucking things up in the other films to justify registration. just not enough history in the films to make me believe that ironman, thor, capt would think splitting up would be a good idea. we just put them together to save the world so why break em up?

once we get more info on the avengers plot i think we'll able to come up with some sweet ideas


they're not a team, they're a time bomb
j_brooks
 
Posts: 6866
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:37 am
Location: rhetorical craccaville

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby cyantific » Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:21 pm

Japanese trailer with some new footage
User avatar
cyantific
 
Posts: 2016
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 7:13 pm

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby Architecture » Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:46 pm

Rhodes wrote:Okay, dream cast: Stephen and Danny (just for laffs).

Clive Owen for Dr. Strange
try the data then reply
User avatar
Architecture
 
Posts: 10357
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:39 am
Location: Texas

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby Architecture » Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:49 pm

Garret Hedlund could make a good Iron Fist
try the data then reply
User avatar
Architecture
 
Posts: 10357
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:39 am
Location: Texas

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby reversemigraine » Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:50 pm

Been waiting a long time for a helicarrier shot.
User avatar
reversemigraine
 
Posts: 4639
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:40 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby Montague Terrace » Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:56 pm

neeson as dr. strange
User avatar
Montague Terrace
 
Posts: 2451
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:29 pm
Location: Tennessee

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby Hal Jordan » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:08 pm

new clip with a good view of the "aliens"

well that was intense
User avatar
Hal Jordan
 
Posts: 8713
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:57 pm

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby Hal Jordan » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:09 pm

looks more like Beta Ray Bill than skrulls


Image

headgear is thanos-esque.
Last edited by Hal Jordan on Sat Mar 31, 2012 7:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
well that was intense
User avatar
Hal Jordan
 
Posts: 8713
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:57 pm

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby badhat » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:10 pm

oh god that RDjr "yeah" take after "we've got a hulk"


like like
Nothing weird is going to happen.
User avatar
badhat
 
Posts: 26069
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: life in the bike lane

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby creationist » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:11 pm

scrullz
User avatar
creationist
 
Posts: 4639
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:51 am

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby wakeman » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:17 pm

Yeah hopefully they are some cosmic threat not just more Asgardians.
User avatar
wakeman
 
Posts: 608
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:35 pm

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby wakeman » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:20 pm

creationist wrote:scrullz


I guess Whedon said it's definitely not Skrulls, cause shapeshifting aliens would add too much to an already loaded movie. Kind of disappointing but understandable.
User avatar
wakeman
 
Posts: 608
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:35 pm

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby creationist » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:35 pm

yeah i was inferring that these guys appear to just be simplified skrull knock-offs
User avatar
creationist
 
Posts: 4639
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:51 am

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby Spotlight Kid » Sat Mar 31, 2012 7:36 pm

Hal Jordan wrote:new clip with a good view of the "aliens"




omg omg omg
an indefensible position, unimaginatively expressed
User avatar
Spotlight Kid
 
Posts: 4907
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:38 pm

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby reversemigraine » Mon Apr 09, 2012 10:36 pm

Variety confirms that Iron Man 3 is gonna introduce the Extremis armor.
User avatar
reversemigraine
 
Posts: 4639
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:40 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby Architecture » Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:10 am

So I guess prevailing thought is Korbinites now?
try the data then reply
User avatar
Architecture
 
Posts: 10357
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:39 am
Location: Texas

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby reversemigraine » Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:46 pm

Well, like Hal said, that looks a lot more like Beta Ray Bill than anything else in the Marvel Universe.

They cut a lot of fat from the Thor mythos by eliminating the Donald Blake/magical cane element of the character, and I seriously doubt the movie will have enough time to flesh out these aliens beyond being fodder to throw at the good guys, so I doubt we'll see BRB.

BUT, if part of Thor's return to Earth early on in the movie involves any discussion about how he'll lose his power if he loses his hammer, or how other worthy people could theoretically wield the hammer -- if it's made explicit at all -- then you know you'll end up seeing some sort of fan-service situation where one of those aliens picks up or catches the hammer and magically gets a suit of armor and a cape for a split second, before he gets clobbered by the Hulk, drops it, and turns back into a regular old drone. Whedon won't be able to pass that up.
User avatar
reversemigraine
 
Posts: 4639
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:40 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby reversemigraine » Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:48 pm

I'm still psyched for this movie, but this is some Episode II-level dialogue and delivery:

User avatar
reversemigraine
 
Posts: 4639
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:40 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby swamp thing » Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:56 pm

reversemigraine wrote:Well, like Hal said, that looks a lot more like Beta Ray Bill than anything else in the Marvel Universe.

They cut a lot of fat from the Thor mythos by eliminating the Donald Blake/magical cane element of the character, and I seriously doubt the movie will have enough time to flesh out these aliens beyond being fodder to throw at the good guys, so I doubt we'll see BRB.

BUT, if part of Thor's return to Earth early on in the movie involves any discussion about how he'll lose his power if he loses his hammer, or how other worthy people could theoretically wield the hammer -- if it's made explicit at all -- then you know you'll end up seeing some sort of fan-service situation where one of those aliens picks up or catches the hammer and magically gets a suit of armor and a cape for a split second, before he gets clobbered by the Hulk, drops it, and turns back into a regular old drone. Whedon won't be able to pass that up.

just got a big ol grin imagining this

totally a bonus character in whatever game they end up making
fuck you mom
User avatar
swamp thing
 
Posts: 7293
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:01 pm
Location: thunderbolt pagoda

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby baleen » Tue Apr 10, 2012 6:52 pm

reversemigraine wrote:I'm still psyched for this movie, but this is some Episode II-level dialogue and delivery:



"hey letterman wants a clip"

"let's just give him the most boring, non-essential, context-free dialogue we can"
I had been eyeing this Post O’alls Royal Traveler vest in “southern” chambray to wear year round here in the South. This will be my fourth Post O’alls piece and I have nothing but amazing things to say about what Takeshi is doing with Post.
User avatar
baleen
 
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 2:10 am
Location: downhill from here

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby Rhodes » Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:54 pm

Man, Hiddleston's Evans impression:

User avatar
Rhodes
 
Posts: 9079
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:23 am
Location: COOL!!! Island

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby endor holocaust » Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:00 pm

reversemigraine wrote:I'm still psyched for this movie, but this is some Episode II-level dialogue and delivery:



And filmed like an ep of CSI or something.
User avatar
endor holocaust
 
Posts: 2693
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:11 pm

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby number none » Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:01 pm

he looks spookily like Fassbender there
User avatar
number none
 
Posts: 7402
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:00 pm

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby baleen » Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:20 pm

Rhodes wrote:Man, Hiddleston's Evans impression:



@ 6:20 - followed by an embarrassing Samuel L Jackson try
I had been eyeing this Post O’alls Royal Traveler vest in “southern” chambray to wear year round here in the South. This will be my fourth Post O’alls piece and I have nothing but amazing things to say about what Takeshi is doing with Post.
User avatar
baleen
 
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 2:10 am
Location: downhill from here

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby Rhodes » Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:23 pm

Yeah that was regrettable.
User avatar
Rhodes
 
Posts: 9079
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:23 am
Location: COOL!!! Island

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby TRASHBOY » Wed Apr 11, 2012 4:37 pm

baleen wrote:
reversemigraine wrote:I'm still psyched for this movie, but this is some Episode II-level dialogue and delivery:



"hey letterman wants a clip"

"let's just give him the most boring, non-essential, context-free dialogue we can"


I think what makes that scene seem so bad is despite the actress talking in a monotone voice you can still detect the same condescending/sarcastic/ironic tone that she uses in HIMYM. "UGH, could there be any way to do defuse that thing?"
User avatar
TRASHBOY
 
Posts: 910
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:09 am

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby reversemigraine » Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:38 pm

It's really SLJ's inability to make "We should tell them to go back to sleep?" sound anything like a question that drives me nuts.
User avatar
reversemigraine
 
Posts: 4639
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:40 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: The Avengers (5.4.2012)

Postby reversemigraine » Thu Apr 12, 2012 1:02 am

Didn't realize the premiere is tonight. Should be interesting to see if/when reax pop up.
User avatar
reversemigraine
 
Posts: 4639
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:40 pm
Location: Arkansas

PreviousNext

Return to Free-for-all