General Stock Talk Thread

Jesus christ you have to be kidding me.

Postby gentleman » Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:20 pm

ecto wrote:all things ive considered

bottom line is the stock is cheap right now, the dilution already drove the stock down to ~1.10. they've been slashing their a/p and total liabilities in the past year, kobo is awfully cheap even if it has competition from the ipad kindle and whatever else

plus bill ackmans the biggest gangster in the industry


dude, these are all good things for the company but unfortunately its not enough. never use the term 'cheap right now.' itll get cheaper. if i can quantify how i look at stocks, its 75% technical, 20% quantitative, and 5% fundamental.
User avatar
gentleman
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:40 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby Totally » Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:24 pm

30-YR FIXED WILL NEVER DIP BELOW 4% until it does
User avatar
Totally
 
Posts: 12356
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:20 pm
Location: Don't Let Me Downville

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby Cynwad » Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:25 pm

I'd trade Borders on the ups and downs, but I wouldn't hold it. No revenue, and little forecasted revenue growth.
User avatar
Cynwad
 
Posts: 319
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:43 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby ecto » Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:29 pm

yeah i dont know why i prefaced that one with buy and hold, if that stock hits 3 again ill probably get out

dole fo and rcl, though, i do like
User avatar
ecto
 
Posts: 16161
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby Totally » Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:48 pm

dudes stop all knowing about trading and being real traders and shit Image
User avatar
Totally
 
Posts: 12356
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:20 pm
Location: Don't Let Me Downville

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby ecto » Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:50 pm

im just a simple man with a roth ira homes
User avatar
ecto
 
Posts: 16161
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby Gehrig Industries » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:21 pm

lol bollinger bands
Let's Acquire Currency =)
User avatar
Gehrig Industries
Special Gehrig Rank
 
Posts: 8523
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:56 am
Location: San Francisco

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby ecto » Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:22 pm

Eleven banks including Germany's Commerzbank and Italy's Banco Popolare will fail the European Union's stress tests, Alessandro Roccati, director at Macquarie Securities, told CNBC Wednesday.

Image
User avatar
ecto
 
Posts: 16161
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby gentleman » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:15 pm

Totally wrote:dudes stop all knowing about trading and being real traders and shit Image


ill talk to you when i need info on mission of burma b-sides...
User avatar
gentleman
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:40 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby ecto » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:17 pm

yea totes you act like we dont remember you sellin off all your s*** last august
User avatar
ecto
 
Posts: 16161
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby Shalabi » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:46 pm

you guys got your bunkers fortified yet?
User avatar
Shalabi
 
Posts: 6389
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:52 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby Totally » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:58 am

ecto wrote:yea totes you act like we dont remember you sellin off all your s*** last august

Hey, I made $5k inside a month on totally ignorant speculative gambling. Gimme a break.
User avatar
Totally
 
Posts: 12356
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:20 pm
Location: Don't Let Me Downville

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby ecto » Fri Jul 16, 2010 1:40 pm

oh yeah goldman settled with the SEC for $550m yesterday. the fact that it wasn't $1b was pretty surprising/deplorable
User avatar
ecto
 
Posts: 16161
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby Totally » Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:56 pm

Disgusting, yeah. How insane are things? Armajaro just cornered the cocoa market and is holding the September contract hostage.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ds-newsxml
User avatar
Totally
 
Posts: 12356
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:20 pm
Location: Don't Let Me Downville

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby ecto » Wed Jul 21, 2010 7:08 pm

bernanke you scoundrel
User avatar
ecto
 
Posts: 16161
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby gentleman » Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:15 pm

ecto wrote:bernanke you scoundrel


do you think thats the reason the market dipped today?
User avatar
gentleman
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:40 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby ecto » Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:03 am

well, things were level or better before the announcement, then every index dipped 1% or more, so yes

but if you're implying that the real reason is widescale uncertainty then yeah that too
User avatar
ecto
 
Posts: 16161
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby Ferrous Bueller » Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:38 am

ecto wrote:bernanke you scoundrel


I've loved the guy ever since I found out he worked at South of the Border as a kid
User avatar
Ferrous Bueller
 
Posts: 2572
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:57 pm
Location: Trinidad

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby mikey » Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:58 pm

at what point do you guys sell stocks?
everything is up now, and i have one that is at 10% up that i bought in april 2009
sordid affair wrote:who is the government to tell me whether or not i can have a four loko w/ my pop tart
User avatar
mikey
 
Posts: 8275
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 1:55 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby ecto » Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:01 pm

royal caribbean rulez
User avatar
ecto
 
Posts: 16161
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby Shotfrog » Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:09 pm

The stock market is ridiculous.
User avatar
Shotfrog
 
Posts: 2863
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:14 pm
Location: Boston

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby Totally » Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:45 pm

Shotfrog wrote:The stock market is ridiculous.

[img]milhousewe'rethroughthelookingglassherepeople[/img]
User avatar
Totally
 
Posts: 12356
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:20 pm
Location: Don't Let Me Downville

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby ecto » Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:43 pm

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/70-35- ... n-biggs-fl

officially no one understands the stock market anymore

June 30 (Bloomberg):

Biggs said bullish bets make up about 70 percent of his investments and isn’t selling because he expects the S&P 500 to finish the year 10 percent to 15 percent above its level now. He favors property developers, oil service companies and technology suppliers in the U.S. and emerging-market equities.



“I still believe that it’s just a soft spot,” said Biggs, who helps oversee $1.4 billion at New York-based Traxis, in a telephone interview yesterday. “If we have 3 percent real GDP growth in the second half, chances are we’re going to get somewhere between $85 and $90 a share in S&P 500 earnings. It might be a little less than that. It might be $80, but S&P 500 earnings are going to be fine.”

July 2 (Bloomberg):

Signs the U.S. economy is weakening convinced Traxis to reverse course as the S&P 500 posted a weekly slump of 5 percent, bringing its loss since April 23 to 16 percent. Biggs, 77, said yesterday he cut bullish bets by about half since June 29, when they made up 70 percent of his fund.



“I can change my mind very quickly,” Biggs, who manages $1.4 billion, said in a telephone interview following the Bloomberg Television appearance. “I’m not wildly bearish, but I don’t want to have a lot of risk at this point. I just want to have less exposure at a time like this.”

July 26

Barton Biggs: "I like big caps, I like techs, I like the oil service space, I like REITs... I clearly think that the right thing to do is to be bullish." And yes, deleveraging is bad, baaaaaad: "The public has a lot of cash, a lot of buying power, and it's not earning anything on its cash." The public also has far more debt, but who gives a crap. This is Barton Biggs, hedge fund manager extraordinaire after all. "I am about 75% of my equity net long."
User avatar
ecto
 
Posts: 16161
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby mikey » Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:58 pm

why is that man in charge of $1.4 billion dollars?
sordid affair wrote:who is the government to tell me whether or not i can have a four loko w/ my pop tart
User avatar
mikey
 
Posts: 8275
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 1:55 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby tth » Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:16 pm

just bought my first stock - 10 shares of american tower
User avatar
tth
 
Posts: 17765
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 4:01 am
Location: OUT SARGING

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby ecto » Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:19 pm

paying 2% commission

already off to a promising start in your investment career
User avatar
ecto
 
Posts: 16161
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby tth » Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:24 pm

flat $5 commission. i gave my dad the money and he bought through his tradeking account since i dont have the minimum equity for anything decent.
User avatar
tth
 
Posts: 17765
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 4:01 am
Location: OUT SARGING

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby ecto » Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:25 pm

o thats not so bad
User avatar
ecto
 
Posts: 16161
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby ecto » Thu Jul 29, 2010 8:16 pm

[Citigroup] will pay $75 million to settle regulatory charges that it failed to disclose $40 billion in subprime exposure to investors in the second and third quarters of 2007, according to people familiar with the matter.The settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission won’t charge the giant bank with fraud, but rather material omission of disclosure requirements, the people said. The SEC is expected to indicate that Citi didn’t intentionally mislead investors, they added.

citi was trading at 55 in may 07
User avatar
ecto
 
Posts: 16161
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: General Stock Talk Thread

Postby Totally » Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:37 pm

ecto wrote:
[Citigroup] will pay $75 million to settle regulatory charges that it failed to disclose $40 billion in subprime exposure to investors in the second and third quarters of 2007, according to people familiar with the matter.The settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission won’t charge the giant bank with fraud, but rather material omission of disclosure requirements, the people said. The SEC is expected to indicate that Citi didn’t intentionally mislead investors, they added.

citi was trading at 55 in may 07

I knew a girl who had $47k in C, single stock, @49, bought as a sure-thing for her and her fiance's down-payment on a house. They live in an apartment in Reading now.
User avatar
Totally
 
Posts: 12356
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:20 pm
Location: Don't Let Me Downville

PreviousNext

Return to Free-for-all