Ankh wrote:No Kills on Big Cat
geoff
big cat
ampersand
me (before I switched)
philipe
Catullus wrote:The no kills need to explain their reasoning. Why wouldn't you want to at least test if our muscle was lucky enough to hit a dirty scab on first scan?
Catullus wrote:The ghost of our muscle man wants to make it interesting. Mr. Ampersand, I'm reflecting on your comments but also wondering what your thoughts are now? Surely we won't get as lucky killing another scan immediately following hitting one early on, but I don't want to just kick someone out of the Union willy nilly. It will surely look terrible for us, and I don't think many of us could afford for it not to go through.
kit fox wrote:Philippe wrote:I still don't think it was unwise - first of all, changing my vote when bigcat was already as good as dead would have looked even dumber.
you voted to tie it
Ankh wrote:w/r/t the Big Cat vote, I personally doubt that the scabs would sacrifice one of their own so early. Especially when there are only 3 of them, the Muscle is unverified, and they possibly already have an idea of who the Muscle is. That's why I'd guess they're there in the NK or late kill votes, like Catullus said.
galactagogue wrote:i usually just assume no one is into me, it makes it easier to be myself.
Suspension Bridge wrote:Werewolf was the best thing to happen to me in 2015 and that includes my wedding
Kenny wrote:If you can remmeber any conversation with a cashier 30 seconds after you had it you're doing it wrong
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests