Can we admit that Obama has a really big stick?

Health insurance rip off lying FDA big bankers buying
Fake computer crashes dining
Cloning while they're multiplying
Fashion shoots with Beck and Hanson
Courtney Love, and Marilyn Manson
You're all fakes
Run to your mansions
Come around
We'll kick your ass in

Postby Amblin » Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:38 pm

The Dirty Turtle wrote:that would have even allowed them to address romneys bullshit about our military shrinking because obama could just say were fighting different battles today and being successful there means looking at things differently...if our biggest threat is al qaeda why would we, trying to be responsible with the budget and not do it all, invest in destroyers instead of drones
oh and by the way, weve killed basically everyone in al-qaeda and their reputation in the muslim world is ruined


If things play out with the debates like usual where we get an economic/domestic policy debate, a "town hall" or probably social media integrated event, and a "foreign policy" debate in which Obama is just going to kill him for 90 minutes with facts and rebuttals built around this point. Romney's only strategy in this type of debate is going to really be avoiding much of the military or war related issues and focus his stronger arguments on the "threat" of Iran, North Korea and probably China.
User avatar
Amblin
 
Posts: 49963
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:08 pm
Location: CA

Postby Amblin » Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:43 pm

Further, I think the only way we lose any points on foreign policy is if Biden fucks up a response in the VP debate. I think Obama exudes confidence on these issues and can articulate his policies and outlook with a lot of authority based on his success. Biden does have that confidence to an extent, I just think speaking on behalf of the President always creates some opportunity to screw up the message, particular when this Vice President is the one delivering that message.
User avatar
Amblin
 
Posts: 49963
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:08 pm
Location: CA

Postby mites » Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:00 pm

yea but biden is more personable and charming and no one fucking knows anything about the world anyway and like no one really votes on the basis of foreign policy
User avatar
mites
 
Posts: 33350
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:41 pm
Location: Bmore

Postby Amblin » Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:08 pm

mites wrote:yea but biden is more personable and charming and no one fucking knows anything about the world anyway and like no one really votes on the basis of foreign policy

First off, President Bush beat John Kerry in 2004 based on foreign policy.

Second, Obama is running for re-election, which means that making the case to keep him in office has to be based primarily on his accomplishments. Clearly the economy is still likely to be the main deciding factor for many voters and he has a whole list of things he can say he did that put us back on a path of growth. But he can really seal the deal by reminding voters of the successes he had with ending the War, wiping out al-Qaeda, getting bin Laden etc. He has a pretty good approval rating when it comes to issues already, so he should probably take advantage of it. It is going to be a big part of this campaign.

People don't have to pay much attention to agree with the War being over in Iraq, Afghanistan drawing down, dead terrorists and whatever sort of progress with Iran the administration can sell to the public by October. Most ignore the details, but all of these issues are pretty familiar to many voters in Ohio, Florida, Virginia and Iowa.
User avatar
Amblin
 
Posts: 49963
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:08 pm
Location: CA

Postby Durham » Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:11 am

Image
something something, dares you to blink
User avatar
Durham
 
Posts: 39481
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: 火車

Postby mites » Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:11 am

Amblin wrote:
mites wrote:yea but biden is more personable and charming and no one fucking knows anything about the world anyway and like no one really votes on the basis of foreign policy

First off, President Bush beat John Kerry in 2004 based on foreign policy.

naw

also incumbents have pretty big advantages unless the economy sucks but thankfully all of the republicans are insane so it would probably really have to suck
User avatar
mites
 
Posts: 33350
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:41 pm
Location: Bmore

Postby Thrills » Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:03 am

:awful:
Last edited by Thrills on Tue Feb 21, 2017 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Thrills
 
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 10:35 am

Postby jarsilver » Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:28 am

the one thing that really irks me about that rove op-ed was his claim that stagflation was worse than the 08 recession. there was no recession during the carter administration.
User avatar
jarsilver
 
Posts: 1765
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:58 pm

Postby arushofwings » Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:33 am

he knows what he's doing
User avatar
arushofwings
 
Posts: 4733
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:34 am
Location: LA

Postby Ted Pikul » Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:19 am

loaf angel wrote:I love how Ted makes every thread as a testament to how fucking boring he is.

"I bought a new garden hose mk 2"
User avatar
Ted Pikul
DARE.
 
Posts: 32228
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Salvador Dali's garden party

Postby Amblin » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:04 pm

mites, go here: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html scroll down to MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE

Combine the percentages of "Iraq" and "Terrorism."

Foreign policy was the biggest issue on voters' minds in 2004.

I do agree about incumbent advantage.
User avatar
Amblin
 
Posts: 49963
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:08 pm
Location: CA

Postby husbands » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:10 pm

I do some work on theories of public opinion, and I really am skeptical that you can say any one issue was the 'biggest' in voters' minds. but foreign policy is definitely an important consideration at times.
ROLL COAL
User avatar
husbands
 
Posts: 11305
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:07 pm

Postby Amblin » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:12 pm

Well lets just agree that voters don't completely ignore it like what was originally claimed.
User avatar
Amblin
 
Posts: 49963
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:08 pm
Location: CA

Postby Zwischenzug » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:28 pm

Yeah the 04 and 06 (and to some extent 08) campaigns were entirely about foreign policy. But, I think it may be better to use the term "national security" when talking about the Bush II reelection.
User avatar
Zwischenzug
 
Posts: 1666
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:21 pm

Postby Amblin » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:34 pm



User avatar
Amblin
 
Posts: 49963
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:08 pm
Location: CA

Postby Zwischenzug » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:41 pm

"Safer, Stronger" and "Whatever It Takes" are probably the best Bush ads. It is also fitting how much the Bush ads copied a lot of the ethos of the Reagan campaign. "Safer, Stronger" seems like it is cut right from "Prouder, Stronger, Better (Morning In America)" and "Wolves" is exactly the same as "Bear."
User avatar
Zwischenzug
 
Posts: 1666
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:21 pm

Postby delgriffith » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:43 pm

Zwischenzug wrote:"Wolves" is exactly the same as "Bear."


Yeah although way more on the nose. It's like they watched "Bear" and thought "let's do that... but really make sure they get it"
User avatar
delgriffith
 
Posts: 4379
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 5:26 pm

Postby Amblin » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:49 pm

Safer, Stronger is really good



I picked the two above because they were attack ads.
User avatar
Amblin
 
Posts: 49963
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:08 pm
Location: CA

Postby husbands » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:53 pm

last semester I was TAing media politics, and teaching kids born in 1992 about all these ads was so fun. people should check out the living room candidate MoMI site: http://www.livingroomcandidate.org/

also I really think wolves makes a clearer point than bear
ROLL COAL
User avatar
husbands
 
Posts: 11305
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:07 pm

Postby lynn minmei » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:55 pm

wow, thanks for that MoMI link
User avatar
lynn minmei
 
Posts: 748
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:30 am

Postby Zwischenzug » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:58 pm

When it comes to presidential politics I sometimes just subscribe to the bugs bunny/daffy duck theory:
(http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2008/03/bugs_bunny_vs_daffy_duck.html)

If only because it is so convenient. Just watching the Bush ads you realize that Kerry (and really the party between Clinton and Obama) had no chance with middle america.
Last edited by Zwischenzug on Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Zwischenzug
 
Posts: 1666
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:21 pm

Postby Zwischenzug » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:59 pm

Yeah, living room candidate is the best source for finding ads.
User avatar
Zwischenzug
 
Posts: 1666
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:21 pm

Postby husbands » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:59 pm

the laughter ad from 1968 is the best. it's the political ad version of the replacements video for bastards of young
ROLL COAL
User avatar
husbands
 
Posts: 11305
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:07 pm

Postby Sharmoota » Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:25 pm

Image
HELP ME
User avatar
Sharmoota
 
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:53 pm
Location: الرياض‎

Postby AdamThomas » Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:14 pm

I am so sick of "When you search for _____ on google, you tens of millions of results" to support the validity of something. Thought we were well over that.
User avatar
AdamThomas
 
Posts: 2515
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: u mad?ison

Postby This Guy » Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:48 pm

From Chris Matthews today
User avatar
This Guy
 
Posts: 8108
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Neutral Good

Postby carlperkins » Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:53 pm

The picture of Obama petting the cat is really doing it for me.
User avatar
carlperkins
 
Posts: 12563
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:20 am

Postby Sharmoota » Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:56 pm

Image
HELP ME
User avatar
Sharmoota
 
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:53 pm
Location: الرياض‎

Postby mites » Mon Mar 26, 2012 12:06 am

forgot I posted that stuff in here.

yeah national security spin is huge, but I forget what we were talking about
User avatar
mites
 
Posts: 33350
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:41 pm
Location: Bmore

Postby carlperkins » Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:34 am

This one's driving Drudge crazy

Leaning toward Medvedev, Obama was overheard asking for time - "particularly with missile defense" - until he is in a better position politically to resolve such issues.

"I understand your message about space," replied Medvedev, who will hand over the presidency to Putin in May.

"This is my last election ... After my election I have more flexibility," Obama said, expressing confidence he will win a second term.

"I will transmit this information to Vladimir," said Medvedev, Putin's protege and long considered number two in Moscow's power structure.
User avatar
carlperkins
 
Posts: 12563
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:20 am

PreviousNext

Return to Don't. Let. Go. You’ve got the music in you.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Annie May, beefbroth inthe shitpipes, CudNylon, Daft Pun, Destroid, funkfunkfunk, fury, gallits, gashed, Google [Bot], Grey Poupon, hilbert, hoopdog, jalapeño ranch, millar, moses, OKterrific, pablito, Pris, Prof. Horatio Hufnagel, pzadvance, rik pik, robotculinaire, The Sunken Place, trouble, Zardoz