by murray st. » Thu Jul 19, 2012 5:22 pm
i should have clarified that there, to me, isn't a perceptible editorial motivation for going so in-depth into it, or any kind of message behind the story. it's obviously newsworthy and they're a big band but if they only wanted to get out the message that this guy is troubled and it affects the band they could have just written up a 500-word news story, which they already did.
instead of publishing a florid account of this guy's bipolar disorder and suicidal tendencies bafflingly accompanied by, like you wrote on tumblr, a bunch of glamour shots of him and the band.
i mean fuck it literally is their job to get a bunch of links and ad revenue based on shit like this so i really am being retarded, congrats to them i guess.