
sordid affair wrote:mcwop23 wrote:what I want to know is what the fuck are we going to do about taking education control away from all these fucking states that won't teach evolution/science. I'd argue that education is by far our biggest problem.
yeah it's huge. do any texas boarders want to weigh in on THIS
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/education/13texas.html
edit: mouse pad beat me
sordid affair wrote:i think the main argument against it is that the president is an enormously important SYMBOL, and that will never change. he (or she) makes very few decisions, but that doesn't really matter

sordid affair wrote:i don't buy that the public option was unpopular. in polls it was unpopular when it wasn't explained, then popular when people knew what it meant
chimp_ wrote:sordid affair wrote:mcwop23 wrote:what I want to know is what the fuck are we going to do about taking education control away from all these fucking states that won't teach evolution/science. I'd argue that education is by far our biggest problem.
yeah it's huge. do any texas boarders want to weigh in on THIS
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/education/13texas.html
edit: mouse pad beat me
wow
badhat wrote:bike solve all problems

badhat wrote:bike solve all problems


powderfinger wrote:sordid affair wrote:i don't buy that the public option was unpopular. in polls it was unpopular when it wasn't explained, then popular when people knew what it meant
The popularity of the public option was of virtually no importance once the left seized on it as their #1 priority, framing a bill with a strong public option as the most liberal of possible outcomes in the eyes of the political press. Lieberman was going to get his pound of flesh in the most painful way possible (remember he singlehandedly killed the Medicare buy-in compromise that the rest of the moderates liked, which was a great idea on its own terms) and Nelson, Lincoln, Landrieu, etc. were always bound to arbitrarily find some way to move the bill to the right in exchange for their vote. Obama has no leverage over any of them whatsoever, so the public option was dead on arrival. That it stayed "alive" for so long is actually, in my opinion, an example of good strategy on the part of Pelosi and Reid because it took heat off the rest of the bill.
Maybe if the netroots had decided that free abortions was their ideal endgame the public option would have made it in.
chimp_ wrote:sordid affair wrote:mcwop23 wrote:what I want to know is what the fuck are we going to do about taking education control away from all these fucking states that won't teach evolution/science. I'd argue that education is by far our biggest problem.
yeah it's huge. do any texas boarders want to weigh in on THIS
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/education/13texas.html
edit: mouse pad beat me
wow
badhat wrote:a lot of times i come across as having strong opinions about things when really i'm just sstrongly against retarded opinions

chimp_ wrote:is it really a good idea to have curriculum decisions made by locally-elected people holding their positions for four years
i mean it would seem like that kind of thing should be as far as possible removed from party politics. tempted to say it should be in the hands of an apolitical civil service organisation perhaps with a governmental committee of oversight, i don't know if that would be at all feasible though
badhat wrote:a lot of times i come across as having strong opinions about things when really i'm just sstrongly against retarded opinions

Jeremy wrote:People are really at their best in single instances.


mcwop23 wrote:I wonder what would happen if education reform was put into the hands of academics.
badhat wrote:a lot of times i come across as having strong opinions about things when really i'm just sstrongly against retarded opinions

wheeljack wrote:chimp_ wrote:is it really a good idea to have curriculum decisions made by locally-elected people holding their positions for four years
i mean it would seem like that kind of thing should be as far as possible removed from party politics. tempted to say it should be in the hands of an apolitical civil service organisation perhaps with a governmental committee of oversight, i don't know if that would be at all feasible though
the people's apolitical nongovernmental civil service is the deepest red
Jeremy wrote:People are really at their best in single instances.




Snatch wrote:guys can we take a little detour to discuss newt gingrich's boarding of the wingnut express
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/05/ ... banes.html

sordid affair wrote:nathan is the single best troll
badhat wrote:a lot of times i come across as having strong opinions about things when really i'm just sstrongly against retarded opinions

i need to get a date with this BEER so i can tickle torture my inhibitions!!
Erik Cheer wrote:Man, I'm not anti-Obama, I'm pro-Obama.
badhat wrote:a lot of times i come across as having strong opinions about things when really i'm just sstrongly against retarded opinions

sordid affair wrote:also, ther'es very little new under the sun in ed policy. it's cyclical. people are touting ideas that were huge in the 70s

Frank wrote:i bet obama would be a great mod
grammatron wrote:sordid affair wrote:also, ther'es very little new under the sun in ed policy. it's cyclical. people are touting ideas that were huge in the 70s
Also, some things that would definitely improve the system are pretty much off the table, ie a longer school year, longer days, etc.

