hipinion.com

Pops Freshenmeyer wrote:Former Biden staffers are going hard on twitter claiming joe was intrecal to its passage, it’s gross

it was pretty sick when he asked warren to thank him for this and she just thanked obama instead

ugh Pete, why you gotta be like that

loaf angel wrote:

Boomers...good?

lol

coop wrote:ugh Pete, why you gotta be like that

this is who he is

what a fuckin technocrat

i guess working at mckinsey after college was a tell that he was a sociopath

saranclaps wrote:i guess working at mckinsey after college was a tell that he was a sociopath

do you have me killfiled

Feech La Manna wrote:

saranclaps wrote:i guess working at mckinsey after college was a tell that he was a sociopath

do you have me killfiled

i don't think so did you post this? i didn't read anything from the debate pages.

It wasn’t just me, several people in here have pointed out the McKinsey stint as one of the red flags he’s a psycho

I feel like I’ve been a broken record about it though

tgk wrote:

reversemigraine wrote:NYT's punditry shitshow of old was way more entertaining than this week's cohort.

yeah where the fuck is brett stephens

bretbugs hibernate in the fall and winter

love to see if folks

there is like a designated buttigieg mckinsey callout squad in this very thread

https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/3633/Who-will-win-the-2020-Democratic-presidential-nomination
Current betting odds
Liz 44%
Joe 19%
Bernie 13%
Mayor Pete 12%

Kamala under Yang and Hillary is pretty funny

my god, is someone raising a point that's already been made in this 1100 page thread

I get they're going after warren for a policy she copied from bernie just cuz she's the frontrunner but she also sure is less effective at defending it too, hmmm

like did her campaign decide the "literally every other halfways decent country in the world has made this work" rebuttal would just have her sounding too sandersian

wow it's been a minute since this thread was moving so slow I had to worry about post stacking

Who’s worse at running for President, Joe or Kamala?

Joe’s got a long history of it but Kamala is really trying hard to catch up

[quote="saranclaps"]

karl lagerfeld looks, all things considered, great

surly wrote:imagine typing "not endorsing is a technocratic move"

this is probably the lowest form of posting. if you don’t have anything to say, don’t post!

or post anyway i guess who am i the curator

ashtrayheart wrote:

surly wrote:imagine typing "not endorsing is a technocratic move"

this is probably the lowest form of posting. if you don’t have anything to say, don’t post!

or post anyway i guess who am i the curator

what i have to say is that statement is fucking nonsensical

Feech La Manna wrote:

I'm just asking questions

LOL. 99% chance this question gets little to no exposition in this article that i will not read.

surly wrote:

ashtrayheart wrote:

surly wrote:imagine typing "not endorsing is a technocratic move"

this is probably the lowest form of posting. if you don’t have anything to say, don’t post!

or post anyway i guess who am i the curator

what i have to say is that statement is fucking nonsensical

hrm i think i know what you mean. i may have used the wrong word, but what i’m getting at is: i like these representatives because they seem to pursue policy based on the will of their constituents and their personal beliefs and have a level of integrity that seems fresh, and endorsing the candidate that aligns well with their purported political beliefs outright would continue that trend, whereas withholding that endorsement seems like a technical political move, a cynical strategy of which i am less than a fan! it certainly wouldn’t put me off them forever or anything and isn’t a total betrayal, but it is less cool.

OK i see what you mean. but under that set of logic, why didn't they endorse sooner? one could argue that they endorsed this week as a calculated response to the fact that bernie's been relatively stagnant in national polls and he's coming off a rough couple of weeks that included a having a heart attack

be happy they endorsed him, but don't pretend it's not just as political as any other endorsement or non-endorsement in any campaign cycle

isn't the whole point of endorsements political? like do they have any non-political value?

Bernie is trying to be the President of the United Stares of America, everything is calculated and pragmatic because he wants to win.

really sick of seeing "Mayor Pete" can people just figure out how to spell his last name already