Tarantino IX: Once Upon A Time In Hollywood

Health insurance rip off lying FDA big bankers buying
Fake computer crashes dining
Cloning while they're multiplying
Fashion shoots with Beck and Hanson
Courtney Love, and Marilyn Manson
You're all fakes
Run to your mansions
Come around
We'll kick your ass in

Postby shacky » Fri Dec 06, 2019 1:54 pm

it should win at least three of the acting oscars imo
User avatar

shacky
 
Posts: 6983
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:28 pm
Location: melbin

Postby furrowed brow » Fri Dec 06, 2019 1:58 pm

lol who would win for actress?
User avatar

furrowed brow
 
Posts: 11054
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:45 pm

Postby shacky » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:03 pm

lena dunham
User avatar

shacky
 
Posts: 6983
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:28 pm
Location: melbin

Postby furrowed brow » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:04 pm

How many films from this year have you seen exactly?
User avatar

furrowed brow
 
Posts: 11054
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:45 pm

Postby shacky » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:07 pm

just this, doctor sleep, and the irishman
User avatar

shacky
 
Posts: 6983
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:28 pm
Location: melbin

Postby furrowed brow » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:08 pm

Granted, Sharon Tate going to her own movie was pretty much the only memorable scene in this for me (well other than the ones that were memorable for bad reasons). Robbie did do an admirable job given that she played a total non-character.
User avatar

furrowed brow
 
Posts: 11054
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:45 pm

Postby Eyeball Kid » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:10 pm

Yes, Robbie should have had a higher word count. That's what matters.
User avatar

Eyeball Kid
 
Posts: 35039
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 1:17 pm

Postby shacky » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:10 pm

it's actually crazy how many good acting noms there will be this year, i feel like all my fave actors made great movies
User avatar

shacky
 
Posts: 6983
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:28 pm
Location: melbin

Postby furrowed brow » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:13 pm

Eyeball Kid wrote:Yes, Robbie should have had a higher word count. That's what matters.


Can you give me a description of the Sharon Tate character in this movie? Like can you tell me how you would characterize using adjectives?
User avatar

furrowed brow
 
Posts: 11054
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:45 pm

Postby Eyeball Kid » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:14 pm

Can someone really be a "character" as opposed to a "non-character" if they don't have a lot of dialogue? The answer is "no".
User avatar

Eyeball Kid
 
Posts: 35039
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 1:17 pm

Postby shacky » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:14 pm

adam driver make 4 movies this year maybe more theres no way of knowing
User avatar

shacky
 
Posts: 6983
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:28 pm
Location: melbin

Postby kirito » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:15 pm

furrowed brow wrote:
Eyeball Kid wrote:Yes, Robbie should have had a higher word count. That's what matters.


Can you give me a description of the Sharon Tate character in this movie? Like can you tell me how you would characterize using adjectives?

pleasant
User avatar

kirito
 
Posts: 7102
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:55 pm
Location: I got rich and it cursed me

Postby furrowed brow » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:15 pm

There are whole movies that have no dialogue and yet tell us things about the characters through their actions.

Regardless, your post is begging the question, if she was just gonna be a wordless non-character, why put her in the film?
User avatar

furrowed brow
 
Posts: 11054
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:45 pm

Postby warmjets » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:16 pm

I loved this damn movie and I really haven't liked much of Tarantinos stuff past Jackie Brown, with maybe the exception of inglorious basterds
User avatar

warmjets
 
Posts: 7333
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:52 pm
Location: capital city

Postby shacky » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:17 pm

is sharon tate, like, the laura palmer of this movie??
User avatar

shacky
 
Posts: 6983
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:28 pm
Location: melbin

Postby Eyeball Kid » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:19 pm

Perhaps you.can understand my reluctance to take this bait when you actually challenged me to use adjectives as a defense? I should take this argument seriously? Especially in light of having to deal with people *in this very thread* who thought the movie was too cruel to the Manson family? Why should I assume this is a good-faith argument?

Lots of questions!
User avatar

Eyeball Kid
 
Posts: 35039
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 1:17 pm

Postby kirito » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:20 pm

furrowed brow wrote:There are whole movies that have no dialogue and yet tell us things about the characters through their actions.

Regardless, your post is begging the question, if she was just gonna be a wordless non-character, why put her in the film?

would you have liked it more if she was killed
User avatar

kirito
 
Posts: 7102
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:55 pm
Location: I got rich and it cursed me

Postby furrowed brow » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:20 pm

eyeball kid, i'm actually not very interested in discussing this movie with, my original posts were addressing shacky.
User avatar

furrowed brow
 
Posts: 11054
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:45 pm

Postby furrowed brow » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:21 pm

kirito wrote:
furrowed brow wrote:There are whole movies that have no dialogue and yet tell us things about the characters through their actions.

Regardless, your post is begging the question, if she was just gonna be a wordless non-character, why put her in the film?

would you have liked it more if she was killed


No
User avatar

furrowed brow
 
Posts: 11054
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:45 pm

Postby furrowed brow » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:22 pm

I would have preferred her not be in the film.
User avatar

furrowed brow
 
Posts: 11054
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:45 pm

Postby Eyeball Kid » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:24 pm

furrowed brow wrote:eyeball kid, i'm actually not very interested in discussing this movie with, my original posts were addressing shacky.

My bad! Your post came in after mine and happened to touch on the subject addressed, but I'll leave it to shacky to address whatever it is you're doing.
User avatar

Eyeball Kid
 
Posts: 35039
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 1:17 pm

Postby shacky » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:25 pm

i feel like she is the warm bright glow at the core of this movie furrowed brow and that robbie fulfills this role with a performance so transcendent it verges on literally luminescent
User avatar

shacky
 
Posts: 6983
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:28 pm
Location: melbin

Postby Bartatua » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:26 pm

shacky's posts on the last page own
i broke somebody's ribs
User avatar

Bartatua
 
Posts: 26807
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:35 pm

Postby furrowed brow » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:26 pm

I mean, idk, the film is what it is, me trying to rewrite it seems pointless. What it is right now is what Tarantino, for some reason, wanted to make, and to me it stoinks. Anyway, of course you all are entitled to your opinion, I'm just wondering, for people saying that this film you garner Robbie a best actress win, like which acting performances from this year are you comparing this one to?
Last edited by furrowed brow on Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar

furrowed brow
 
Posts: 11054
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:45 pm

Postby shacky » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:28 pm

anna paquin and rose the hate
User avatar

shacky
 
Posts: 6983
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:28 pm
Location: melbin

Postby furrowed brow » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:29 pm

shacky wrote:i feel like she is the warm bright glow at the core of this movie furrowed brow and that robbie fulfills this role with a performance so transcendent it verges on literally luminescent


indeed, the very picture of innocence
User avatar

furrowed brow
 
Posts: 11054
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:45 pm

Postby furrowed brow » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:29 pm

shacky wrote:anna paquin and rose the hate


how many movies have you seen this year that actually have women leads?
User avatar

furrowed brow
 
Posts: 11054
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:45 pm

Postby Thrustin Jeroux » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:31 pm

you are only coming through in waves
Thrustin Jeroux
 
Posts: 41078
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:05 am

Postby furrowed brow » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:31 pm

like, sorry, maybe you were being hyperbolic with your initial comments, but it's weird to me to say something like that without having surveyed the competition
User avatar

furrowed brow
 
Posts: 11054
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:45 pm

Postby shacky » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:33 pm

i think one of us might be super stoned man
User avatar

shacky
 
Posts: 6983
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:28 pm
Location: melbin

PreviousNext

Return to Mamma Mia... Here We Go Again....

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: act five, AdamThomas, alaska, Alexis, Althea, anephric, antoine, Architecture, Arturo, auspice, axelrod gunnarson, Brunch Buttsteak, budlite supernova, building jumper, buriedinspace, chairkicker, chowder julius, Christmas Ape, clouds, collin, conductor, Cronos, dada, dang, davideotape, def from above, didier, dimetrodons 'r' us, Double McDouble, down with homework, dreamshake, drudge, en svensk tiger, Eyeball Kid, fosse, fresh, Future, futurist, goldmatt, goldsoundz, Google Feedfetcher, grayfox, guaranteed mediocrity, Hal Jordan, hamilton, harmonica, hazel, Hideaway Lights, hideout, hologram, i am rich, Ill-Advised Webinar, jalapeño ranch, joe, KALM, kayke, kirito, landspeedrecord, lebowski, lightfoot, lordofdiapers, Lucky, lust, manvstrees, maraschinocherry, Marza, mcwop23, mego, Merciel, MikeyJ, Mister Modular, mmmbop, mondays, mooncalf, neta, nicecatbutchicken, normal forest, palmer eldritch, Phil, pinkerton, Pops Freshenmeyer, potentialgetawaydriver, powderfinger, Primary, quadrivium, rap and country, Real Real Real, rich uncle skeleton, ripersnifle, robotculinaire, roygbiv, ruse, s/ns, sassafras socks, Science, screaming emphysema, scurrydog, shame dawg, sliiimer, Smelly_Elevator, Sobieski, son of chucky, southpaw, sunglasses, Sutro, tea preacher, ten chimneys , tgk, That Demon Life, The Producer, This Guy, tornhand, transitive, unsandpiper, unscrambled, v h g, virile, virtuous, wakeman, wish