Photography gear thread, mk II

Health insurance rip off lying FDA big bankers buying
Fake computer crashes dining
Cloning while they're multiplying
Fashion shoots with Beck and Hanson
Courtney Love, and Marilyn Manson
You're all fakes
Run to your mansions
Come around
We'll kick your ass in

Postby jubjub » Thu Oct 03, 2019 3:10 am

brittle wrote:did anybody snag a 100 dollar a6000 on prime day? i just now read about it.

I did, just got in a few days ago. The learning begins.
shacky wrote:almost all my dreams are set at parties isnt that interesting
User avatar

jubjub
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2019 1:40 am

Postby Seamus » Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:03 pm

hi board, whats a good cheap film camera for a novice who mainly wants to fuck about with it on their holidays or whatever? needs to be fairly small too. something like a pentax k1000?
Raise. Hell. All. Summer. Long.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar

Seamus
 
Posts: 10497
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:49 pm

Postby table for one » Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:08 pm

nikon fm and canon ae1 are good alternatves to the pentax
User avatar

table for one
 
Posts: 484
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 5:15 pm

Postby table for one » Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:10 pm

i keep an fm2 in my lineup they made really solid glass for it so u can always level up.
User avatar

table for one
 
Posts: 484
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 5:15 pm

Postby dcm » Wed Nov 13, 2019 7:44 pm

So my brother is getting married next month in a very small ceremony that's going to take place in his future sister-in-law's living room. He's asked me to do photography for it and has even offered to pay for off-camera lighting solutions. I'm a total novice in this realm and don't know what might be optimal. Anyone have suggestions? In all likelihood I'll be using my x100f.

I can post a pic of the room later but it's not very big. Intuitively it seems like anything more than 1-2 small strobes would be overkill, but again, iunno
User avatar

dcm
 
Posts: 7011
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:23 pm

Postby Fullscreen » Fri Feb 14, 2020 10:21 pm

Having a particular issue with my G7/Viltrox/Tamron combo. Using the zoom locks up the body and display, both while recording and in live view. I have to eject the battery to reset the camera. It's random, but consistent enough that I can't really use the adapter anymore.

So far I've found nothing online addressing this, though the GH5 has a similar fault with Metabones with a documented workaround. I have tried the Viltrox on my GH2 with no issues, only the G7 is a problem.

If you all know any good lumix resources for troubleshooting this I'd appreciate it.
doomedhuh wrote:only love can break your heart
User avatar

Fullscreen
 
Posts: 11143
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:25 pm
Location: Sunset City

Postby baleen » Fri Feb 14, 2020 10:43 pm

jubjub wrote:
brittle wrote:did anybody snag a 100 dollar a6000 on prime day? i just now read about it.

I did, just got in a few days ago. The learning begins.


$100 for an a6000 is an insane deal. wow. i missed this, have an a6500 (sony replaced my "jumped in a lake with it" a6000 w a 6500 for like $180 so, okay) but i'd drop $100 just to have a backup body and i'm just a jerk who carries a camera around.
The answer is simple: artisanship.
User avatar

baleen
 
Posts: 8189
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:10 pm
Location: downhill from here

Postby AdamThomas » Sat Feb 15, 2020 9:56 am

new scanners are not kind to film sux
User avatar

AdamThomas
 
Posts: 2738
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: u mad?ison

Postby Debbie » Sat Feb 15, 2020 10:05 am

How so
User avatar

Debbie
 
Posts: 3987
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:48 pm

Postby AdamThomas » Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:54 am

User avatar

AdamThomas
 
Posts: 2738
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: u mad?ison

Postby Debbie » Sat Feb 15, 2020 2:33 pm

I thought that was always the case
User avatar

Debbie
 
Posts: 3987
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:48 pm

Postby quinine » Sat Feb 15, 2020 2:39 pm

just for isos above 800. which is what I used to usually shoot so I always opted out then they bomb-swab it, instead. I assume that's still an option?
Dr. Norm Thagard wrote:You have truly outside yourself
User avatar

quinine
ok
 
Posts: 8143
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:29 pm
Location: 0,0 / The Shinto Zone

Postby hopped » Sat Feb 15, 2020 2:41 pm

it used to be only high speed film (>ISO800) that would be fucked up by airport x rays, looks like that's no longer the case


got given a busted designjet 500 42" printer and got it back up and running for about $400 in parts, i'm scanning now at 4000dpi with a nikon coolscan 5000, printed some 35mm scans at 40x60 and they look fucking amazing, grain comes through without any digital artifacting, super impressive.
User avatar

hopped
 
Posts: 1881
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:05 pm

Postby AdamThomas » Sun Feb 16, 2020 8:37 am

hopped wrote:it used to be only high speed film (>ISO800) that would be fucked up by airport x rays, looks like that's no longer the case


got given a busted designjet 500 42" printer and got it back up and running for about $400 in parts, i'm scanning now at 4000dpi with a nikon coolscan 5000, printed some 35mm scans at 40x60 and they look fucking amazing, grain comes through without any digital artifacting, super impressive.




Great post.

Sounds kinda funny but can you show us the setup and a photo print? My buddy HiRes has some scanners that he’s perfecting including a Nikon 5000 (methinks). Kinda amazing to have a setup that’s “super impressive” for film at home...I haven’t been shooting film much since I moved back from Asia because of price but a good setup would sure make the difference.
User avatar

AdamThomas
 
Posts: 2738
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: u mad?ison

Postby hopped » Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:18 pm

hilariously the only digital camera i have right now is the webcam on my laptop so not really. i'm having a show in LA next month that should have some good documentation so if i remember i'll post them here. really leaning into the luddite life.

realistically the cost is still pretty ridiculous, even though the printer was free (+ a belt ($100), carriage repair($40), all new printheads (~$60/set for expired) and ink($40/color)), a 39' roll of 36" cotton rag is ~$300, 42" canon or HP archival matte paper are not much cheaper. and the printer is really finicky, for each successful print that i get i probably average at least 2 that fail for a variety of reasons (sometimes no discernable reason!!). a 30x45 lustre print from nations is only $30 when they're having a sale so it's mostly a hobby thing/wanting very large matte/cotton rag prints for shows. on the other hand, the ability to really dial in test strips, paper, color profiles etc. really makes the final product a lot better. or at least i tell myself that.

there's honestly no comparison between a dedicated strip film scanner and a flatbed to me, the strip scanner is just miles better in capturing what you see when looking at a slide under a loupe or microscope. i'm sure a $10k imacon drum would be even better but lmao. you can get a good used coolscan 5000 for ~1k on ebay


here's some full crop of scans of some iso800 35mm film (top one shot on a 350mm cassegrain lens, bottom on 50mm prime):


Image
Image
User avatar

hopped
 
Posts: 1881
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:05 pm

Postby AdamThomas » Sun Feb 16, 2020 6:09 pm

hopped wrote:hilariously the only digital camera i have right now is the webcam on my laptop so not really. i'm having a show in LA next month that should have some good documentation so if i remember i'll post them here. really leaning into the luddite life.

realistically the cost is still pretty ridiculous, even though the printer was free (+ a belt ($100), carriage repair($40), all new printheads (~$60/set for expired) and ink($40/color)), a 39' roll of 36" cotton rag is ~$300, 42" canon or HP archival matte paper are not much cheaper. and the printer is really finicky, for each successful print that i get i probably average at least 2 that fail for a variety of reasons (sometimes no discernable reason!!). a 30x45 lustre print from nations is only $30 when they're having a sale so it's mostly a hobby thing/wanting very large matte/cotton rag prints for shows. on the other hand, the ability to really dial in test strips, paper, color profiles etc. really makes the final product a lot better. or at least i tell myself that.

there's honestly no comparison between a dedicated strip film scanner and a flatbed to me, the strip scanner is just miles better in capturing what you see when looking at a slide under a loupe or microscope. i'm sure a $10k imacon drum would be even better but lmao. you can get a good used coolscan 5000 for ~1k on ebay


here's some full crop of scans of some iso800 35mm film (top one shot on a 350mm cassegrain lens, bottom on 50mm prime):


Image
Image



Awesome. You should PM me deets of your show...I'm not out there but friends are and I can tell 'em about it.

Thanks for sharing. Looking forward to having film be more a part of my life soon again.
User avatar

AdamThomas
 
Posts: 2738
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: u mad?ison

Previous

Return to Mamma Mia... Here We Go Again....

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: amaro_bianco, auspice, Autarch, Bad Craziness, BanEmAll Collective, boa, Brevity, brip, bruceagain, bubblun, chargie, fester, Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, haddonfield, halliwell, helix krull, internethandle, jalapeño ranch, joe, Jouster, Kaputt, KPH, la croix, Longarm, Melville, neta, No Good Advice, Parson Floogle, polybius, Poptone, quilty, realcoolattitude, scrumptown, Sobieski, Subbacultcha, subtitles, sushi x, Sutro, tick, trampoline, trouble, viachicago, winjer