The 2020 Primary and General Election Thread:Welcome to Hell

Health insurance rip off lying FDA big bankers buying
Fake computer crashes dining
Cloning while they're multiplying
Fashion shoots with Beck and Hanson
Courtney Love, and Marilyn Manson
You're all fakes
Run to your mansions
Come around
We'll kick your ass in

Postby saranclaps » Wed Oct 16, 2019 11:41 am



Real Love wrote:every once in a while saranclaps will try to do a funny and it's an extremely off note but I'm not totally convinced he's aware of what is happening
User avatar

saranclaps
 
Posts: 21199
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:49 pm
Location: vasing for interludes

Postby Feech La Manna » Wed Oct 16, 2019 11:45 am

It wasn’t just me, several people in here have pointed out the McKinsey stint as one of the red flags he’s a psycho

I feel like I’ve been a broken record about it though
badhat wrote:bike solve all problems
User avatar

Feech La Manna
noir as fuck
 
Posts: 91507
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:45 pm
Location: Snoopy and Prickly Pete

Postby villalobos » Wed Oct 16, 2019 11:47 am

tgk wrote:
reversemigraine wrote:NYT's punditry shitshow of old was way more entertaining than this week's cohort.


yeah where the fuck is brett stephens


bretbugs hibernate in the fall and winter
villalobos
 
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:54 pm

Postby villalobos » Wed Oct 16, 2019 11:53 am

love to see if folks
villalobos
 
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:54 pm

Postby my piano » Wed Oct 16, 2019 11:56 am

there is like a designated buttigieg mckinsey callout squad in this very thread
User avatar
my piano
 

Postby coop » Wed Oct 16, 2019 11:57 am

User avatar

coop
 
Posts: 17327
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:29 am
Location: San Junipero

Postby Feech La Manna » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:01 pm

Kamala under Yang and Hillary is pretty funny
badhat wrote:bike solve all problems
User avatar

Feech La Manna
noir as fuck
 
Posts: 91507
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:45 pm
Location: Snoopy and Prickly Pete

Postby quinine » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:03 pm

my god, is someone raising a point that's already been made in this 1100 page thread
Dr. Norm Thagard wrote:You have truly outside yourself
User avatar

quinine
ok
 
Posts: 8655
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:29 pm
Location: 0,0 / The Shinto Zone

Postby quinine » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:04 pm

I get they're going after warren for a policy she copied from bernie just cuz she's the frontrunner but she also sure is less effective at defending it too, hmmm
Dr. Norm Thagard wrote:You have truly outside yourself
User avatar

quinine
ok
 
Posts: 8655
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:29 pm
Location: 0,0 / The Shinto Zone

Postby quinine » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:06 pm

like did her campaign decide the "literally every other halfways decent country in the world has made this work" rebuttal would just have her sounding too sandersian

wow it's been a minute since this thread was moving so slow I had to worry about post stacking
Dr. Norm Thagard wrote:You have truly outside yourself
User avatar

quinine
ok
 
Posts: 8655
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:29 pm
Location: 0,0 / The Shinto Zone

Postby Feech La Manna » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:11 pm

Who’s worse at running for President, Joe or Kamala?

Joe’s got a long history of it but Kamala is really trying hard to catch up
badhat wrote:bike solve all problems
User avatar

Feech La Manna
noir as fuck
 
Posts: 91507
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:45 pm
Location: Snoopy and Prickly Pete

Postby Sissy Spacerock » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:21 pm

[quote="saranclaps"]

karl lagerfeld looks, all things considered, great
ʸᴼᵁ ᵀᴴᴵᴺᴷ ʸᴼᵁ ᴷᴺᴼᵂ ᴹᴱ
User avatar

Sissy Spacerock
 
Posts: 12078
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:35 pm

Postby ashtrayheart » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:24 pm

surly wrote:imagine typing "not endorsing is a technocratic move"

this is probably the lowest form of posting. if you don’t have anything to say, don’t post!

or post anyway i guess who am i the curator
Last edited by ashtrayheart on Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar

ashtrayheart
 
Posts: 2621
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:02 am

Postby Lowercase Tea » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:24 pm

Lowercase Tea
 
Posts: 3908
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:37 pm

Postby surly » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:33 pm

ashtrayheart wrote:
surly wrote:imagine typing "not endorsing is a technocratic move"

this is probably the lowest form of posting. if you don’t have anything to say, don’t post!

or post anyway i guess who am i the curator

what i have to say is that statement is fucking nonsensical
lordofdiapers wrote:damn it Greedo will forever fuck that word for me
User avatar

surly
the insult bastard
 
Posts: 36322
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: MD

Postby galactagogue » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:47 pm

Feech La Manna wrote:

I'm just asking questions



LOL. 99% chance this question gets little to no exposition in this article that i will not read.
Bob511 wrote:It's important to remember, though, that California has more psychologists than any other state.
User avatar

galactagogue
 
Posts: 13789
Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 12:27 pm

Postby ashtrayheart » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:59 pm

surly wrote:
ashtrayheart wrote:
surly wrote:imagine typing "not endorsing is a technocratic move"

this is probably the lowest form of posting. if you don’t have anything to say, don’t post!

or post anyway i guess who am i the curator

what i have to say is that statement is fucking nonsensical

hrm i think i know what you mean. i may have used the wrong word, but what i’m getting at is: i like these representatives because they seem to pursue policy based on the will of their constituents and their personal beliefs and have a level of integrity that seems fresh, and endorsing the candidate that aligns well with their purported political beliefs outright would continue that trend, whereas withholding that endorsement seems like a technical political move, a cynical strategy of which i am less than a fan! it certainly wouldn’t put me off them forever or anything and isn’t a total betrayal, but it is less cool.
User avatar

ashtrayheart
 
Posts: 2621
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:02 am

Postby surly » Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:14 pm

OK i see what you mean. but under that set of logic, why didn't they endorse sooner? one could argue that they endorsed this week as a calculated response to the fact that bernie's been relatively stagnant in national polls and he's coming off a rough couple of weeks that included a having a heart attack

be happy they endorsed him, but don't pretend it's not just as political as any other endorsement or non-endorsement in any campaign cycle
lordofdiapers wrote:damn it Greedo will forever fuck that word for me
User avatar

surly
the insult bastard
 
Posts: 36322
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: MD

Postby galactagogue » Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:20 pm

isn't the whole point of endorsements political? like do they have any non-political value?
Bob511 wrote:It's important to remember, though, that California has more psychologists than any other state.
User avatar

galactagogue
 
Posts: 13789
Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 12:27 pm

Postby Klint » Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:26 pm

Bernie is trying to be the President of the United Stares of America, everything is calculated and pragmatic because he wants to win.
mites wrote:going back to ruining my life with drugs and drink and listening to public image ltd
User avatar

Klint
 
Posts: 18257
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:09 pm

Postby trouble » Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:27 pm

really sick of seeing "Mayor Pete" can people just figure out how to spell his last name already
Now exclusively in Bland Mode.
User avatar

trouble
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22468
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:56 pm
Location: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_seas

Postby galactagogue » Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:38 pm

trouble wrote:really sick of seeing "Mayor Pete" can people just figure out how to spell his last name already


no.
Bob511 wrote:It's important to remember, though, that California has more psychologists than any other state.
User avatar

galactagogue
 
Posts: 13789
Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 12:27 pm

Postby Bernie » Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:40 pm

John Mayer Pete
User avatar

Bernie
Mayonnaise Boy
 
Posts: 17462
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:47 pm

Postby palmer eldritch » Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:41 pm

you will call him Peter Paul Montgomery Buttigieg or face the banhammer
User avatar

palmer eldritch
 
Posts: 44259
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:41 pm

Postby Marx & Engels » Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:10 pm



Lol
User avatar

Marx & Engels
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:44 pm

Postby palmer eldritch » Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:13 pm


User avatar

palmer eldritch
 
Posts: 44259
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:41 pm

Postby gutenmorgan » Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:13 pm

If anyone wants to be miserable I highly recommend reading the takes on last night from 6 centrist ghouls unearthed by the NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/16/us/politics/democratic-debate-review.html

Senator Klobuchar had a great night again. She had it all: intelligence, humor, authenticity, relatability; she knew how to play offense without appearing mean or angry. She was even the first to mention Ohio! Her consistently excellent performances, along with those of Senator Booker and Andrew Yang, should make us all stop and wonder why the D.N.C. set up a debate process seemingly designed to reinforce the inevitability of the top few candidates while making sure they are attacked as much as possible before the general election.
User avatar

gutenmorgan
 
Posts: 1889
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:33 am

Postby Marx & Engels » Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:18 pm

palmer eldritch wrote:


Bernie's "meh" for +2.2 net favorability is Nate's version of an 8.2 no best new music
User avatar

Marx & Engels
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:44 pm

Postby palmer eldritch » Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:22 pm

the changes in net fav are all pretty minor. beto, castro, and gabbard look kinda crappy. klobuchar had an effective night. pete's net fav change is actually the same as bernie yeah.
User avatar

palmer eldritch
 
Posts: 44259
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:41 pm

Postby villalobos » Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:23 pm

trouble wrote:really sick of seeing "Mayor Pete" can people just figure out how to spell his last name already


never
villalobos
 
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:54 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Mamma Mia... Here We Go Again....

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: aladdin pain, alaska, Althea, Annie May, Arturo, Autarch, average deceiver, Bartatua, blckchrry, boddy, Buddy Glass, budlite supernova, building jumper, buriedinspace, cam'ron hubbard, carlperkins, Chyet, concerning, cooly, darger, Dead_Wizard, deebster, denvermax, Double McDouble, droctagon2000, drudge, elevators, elo, emotional fascism, epistrophy, Ersaph, Eyeball Kid, fakename, Feech La Manna, folkface, Frank, fresh salad, garbiel, gauchebag, gentleman, gobot, goldsoundz, goofjan, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, griffith scannell, growinging, gucci man, Gyant, Hal Jordan, hazel, hbb, hideout, hit record, hoopdog, Hugh, hyperbole man, Ides of Smarch, inmate, internethandle, it's the suspense that gets me, jca, jenmichaeljarre, joe, jon, KALM, kid pretentious, Kiki, kirito, klubrick, KPH, landspeedrecord, launchpad, lights, loaf angel, lodger, lordofdiapers, lotso, Lucky, mactheo, Marza, mcwop23, Meeps, MikeyJ, Mister Modular, nosebleeds, Phil, polybius, Poptone, potentialgetawaydriver, pretty yeoman, Pris, qmass, quinine, R C, rankoutsider, razzle, resum, rex, rich uncle skeleton, scrambled, scrumptown, shacky, smartphone, smokehousecheddar, sniplets, snuggle, son of chucky, super gas, tea preacher, tgk, The Fool on the Hill, The Puma Man, theta, This Guy, transitive, turquoise albino, Vacancies, Vaneigem, velvet anus, virtuous, walt, warmjets, wuk, yawn, Zurich